Threats, well its a term that has been used by Prof Rajeev Kumar too many times. After the JEE bust he did, he made some great contacts in the media and used that to pass on his own messages to public. And to get Indian public sympathy, to show them how he is getting victimised, (maybe this was done more to hide his own mistakes) he went on crying about his own safety. As to how he was being threatened by IIT administration. IIT already had too many proofs against him, so why would they even care to threaten him? They already had the power to take action against him which finally they did when it was found how with false allegations he was maligning the institute.
And what to say about the threats his media friends passed on others who differed with their views?? Check this article and see how the journalists of this article threatened few only because they were speaking out against them. Is that how journalism works? Lets leave that part aside for sometime, journos part would be taken up later. For now first check this. Respectable journalists indulging in threatening readers just because they did not agree to their views.
http://www.moneylife.in/article/irregularities-in-iit-jee-will-the-new-hrd-minister-offer-justice-to-this-tenacious-whistleblower/29436.html
Question that comes to our mind is who really can threaten him? He has a lawyer like Bhushan to support him. He has contacts in media which he can use any moment to malign someone.
Interestingly there are proofs where Prof Rajeev Kumar himself had threatened. Infact he does it many times, using cleverly crafted words in mails (we have come across a mail of his during the period of IIT Delhi Professor's interview where he is threatening one of the panel member cunningly).
Well now to come to the main point, he threatened IIT Kharagpur Dean of Postgraduate Studies to ‘rescue’ himself. When this charge was put against him, Kumar ingenuously claimed that “what he wanted to write was ‘recuse’. This ‘honest error’ of transformation of ‘recuse’ to ‘rescue’ was due to the ‘Autocorrect and auto-spell checking’ policy of MS Word!!! It is therefore not his fault and he may be kindly excused.” His admirers naturally gave in to this argument. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating thereof. An actual test for this was carried out. Please see the screen shot from MS Word.
Well Well Well Prof Kumar, sorry to say but the alternatives do not show rescue as an option!!
So isn't it evident that what Kumar says is bogus!!
And what to say about the threats his media friends passed on others who differed with their views?? Check this article and see how the journalists of this article threatened few only because they were speaking out against them. Is that how journalism works? Lets leave that part aside for sometime, journos part would be taken up later. For now first check this. Respectable journalists indulging in threatening readers just because they did not agree to their views.
http://www.moneylife.in/article/irregularities-in-iit-jee-will-the-new-hrd-minister-offer-justice-to-this-tenacious-whistleblower/29436.html
Question that comes to our mind is who really can threaten him? He has a lawyer like Bhushan to support him. He has contacts in media which he can use any moment to malign someone.
Interestingly there are proofs where Prof Rajeev Kumar himself had threatened. Infact he does it many times, using cleverly crafted words in mails (we have come across a mail of his during the period of IIT Delhi Professor's interview where he is threatening one of the panel member cunningly).
Well now to come to the main point, he threatened IIT Kharagpur Dean of Postgraduate Studies to ‘rescue’ himself. When this charge was put against him, Kumar ingenuously claimed that “what he wanted to write was ‘recuse’. This ‘honest error’ of transformation of ‘recuse’ to ‘rescue’ was due to the ‘Autocorrect and auto-spell checking’ policy of MS Word!!! It is therefore not his fault and he may be kindly excused.” His admirers naturally gave in to this argument. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating thereof. An actual test for this was carried out. Please see the screen shot from MS Word.
 |
| Click image to enlarge |
Well Well Well Prof Kumar, sorry to say but the alternatives do not show rescue as an option!!
So isn't it evident that what Kumar says is bogus!!
No comments:
Post a Comment