In this article let us show you all how Prof Rajeev Kumar hand in glove with few media personal pass out selective information to the Indian public. Read through these articles. They all say the same, that Supreme Court had called Prof Kumar as the "Unsung Hero". Do check the dates of the articles.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-13/india/30274714_1_official-cutoffs-cutoff-procedure-jee-candidates
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Top-court-calls-IIT-whistleblower-prof-an-unsung-hero/Article1-756607.aspx
Even the well known Eklavyajee blog (popular belief being its run by Prof Kumar himself), had put up the articles.
http://eklavyajee06.blogspot.in/2011/10/sc-iit-whistleblower-unsung-hero-in.html
All these pertain to the case which was disposed off by Supreme Court on 11th Oct 2011. Let me now show you all the court order which was passed by SC.
http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/sc%201349510p.txt
What these articles NEVER mentioned that SC dismissed the case filed by Prof Kumar on behalf of his son Mr Sanchit Bansal.
" But there is no ground for that Courts to interfere with the procedure, even if it was not accurate or efficient, in the absence of malafides or arbitrariness or violation of law. It is true that if in JEE 2006, a different or better process had been adopted, or the process now in vogue had been adopted, the results would have been different and the first appellant might have obtained a seat. But on that ground it is not possible to impute malafides or arbitrariness, or grant any relief to the first appellant. Therefore, the appellant will have to be satisfied in being one of the many unsung heroes who helped in improving the system."
Yes no second question that he did make the JEE system better and a hero for the same, but no where we find anything that suggest SC had actually HAILED him high as a Hero, as our media seem to be suggesting. Why do they have to be selective while reporting Mr Kumar's case? They never seem to even give a thought to recheck/confirm with other party when Rajeev Kumar give them any info, and go ahead with detailed false reporting. Then why not the full truth in the case of Rajeev Kumar????
Case -2
Now here's another case that was filed by the Professor and has now been disposed off. This case if from Delhi High Court, year 2010. No media took the pain, or maybe just looked sideways, in reporting this case.
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/253540/
Just a small part of the judgement as passed by Hon Judge.
Page 4 of 5 - "Ordinarily, we would have saddled the petitioner with exemplary cost of more than five figures but keeping in view the fact that he is a young man and seems to be misguided in filing this type of litigation in the name of public interest, we refrain from imposing cost. At the same time, we hope and trust that the learned counsel representing the petitioner will be more discreet in future and avoid filing of such type of litigation, disposal of which has consumed substantial time of the Court which could have been utilized for deciding other cases."
So Dear Mr Kumar's media friends, it do raises lot of question on your work ethics.
For readers, do ponder and think if all that media is telling about Rajeev Kumar is true or not. Ponder if they are reporting the whole matter or is it just the partial truth being shown, draped in such a way that it projects Mr Kumar in a good light.
Have a good day,
Oh did we tell you of the fact that Prof Kumar filed cases against JEE practices against IITJEE twice. Want to know when? It was done twice, first when his son could not crack JEE and he wanted him to get it done through court (as shown in the above cases) and second time again in 2010, just when his daughter failed to get through. That do tells a lot, does it not????
Cheers!!!
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-13/india/30274714_1_official-cutoffs-cutoff-procedure-jee-candidates
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Top-court-calls-IIT-whistleblower-prof-an-unsung-hero/Article1-756607.aspx
Even the well known Eklavyajee blog (popular belief being its run by Prof Kumar himself), had put up the articles.
http://eklavyajee06.blogspot.in/2011/10/sc-iit-whistleblower-unsung-hero-in.html
All these pertain to the case which was disposed off by Supreme Court on 11th Oct 2011. Let me now show you all the court order which was passed by SC.
http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/sc%201349510p.txt
What these articles NEVER mentioned that SC dismissed the case filed by Prof Kumar on behalf of his son Mr Sanchit Bansal.
" But there is no ground for that Courts to interfere with the procedure, even if it was not accurate or efficient, in the absence of malafides or arbitrariness or violation of law. It is true that if in JEE 2006, a different or better process had been adopted, or the process now in vogue had been adopted, the results would have been different and the first appellant might have obtained a seat. But on that ground it is not possible to impute malafides or arbitrariness, or grant any relief to the first appellant. Therefore, the appellant will have to be satisfied in being one of the many unsung heroes who helped in improving the system."
Yes no second question that he did make the JEE system better and a hero for the same, but no where we find anything that suggest SC had actually HAILED him high as a Hero, as our media seem to be suggesting. Why do they have to be selective while reporting Mr Kumar's case? They never seem to even give a thought to recheck/confirm with other party when Rajeev Kumar give them any info, and go ahead with detailed false reporting. Then why not the full truth in the case of Rajeev Kumar????
Case -2
Now here's another case that was filed by the Professor and has now been disposed off. This case if from Delhi High Court, year 2010. No media took the pain, or maybe just looked sideways, in reporting this case.
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/253540/
Just a small part of the judgement as passed by Hon Judge.
Page 4 of 5 - "Ordinarily, we would have saddled the petitioner with exemplary cost of more than five figures but keeping in view the fact that he is a young man and seems to be misguided in filing this type of litigation in the name of public interest, we refrain from imposing cost. At the same time, we hope and trust that the learned counsel representing the petitioner will be more discreet in future and avoid filing of such type of litigation, disposal of which has consumed substantial time of the Court which could have been utilized for deciding other cases."
So Dear Mr Kumar's media friends, it do raises lot of question on your work ethics.
For readers, do ponder and think if all that media is telling about Rajeev Kumar is true or not. Ponder if they are reporting the whole matter or is it just the partial truth being shown, draped in such a way that it projects Mr Kumar in a good light.
Have a good day,
Oh did we tell you of the fact that Prof Kumar filed cases against JEE practices against IITJEE twice. Want to know when? It was done twice, first when his son could not crack JEE and he wanted him to get it done through court (as shown in the above cases) and second time again in 2010, just when his daughter failed to get through. That do tells a lot, does it not????
Cheers!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment